Yes, it is very important that one identifies expertise in that area of research and from there finds other possible collaborators who are interested in coming together to find solution to the emerging problem to be addressed
Overcoming these challenges can be through identifying and engaging with a local institution in the conflict area, this will ensure project viability and implementation
Key questions will be the identification of key stakeholders required for the implementation of the project and evaluating the risks associated with project implementation in the conflict area.
The next step is identifying local collaborators with an in-depth network and knowledge of the conflict-affected area and working together in developing a risk/security mitigation strategy that will guide the implementation of the project successful.
We all agree that that big question is identifying the key stakeholders and if we are to effectively do this, taking keen observation on the purpose, goal, objectives and the beneficiaries of the intended project is key in identifying key stakeholders to the project implementation.
Understanding the scope of the intended project is vital for the proper mapping of relevant stakeholders to engage as well as for identifying potential collaborators to work with.
Key questions include
1. Decision on the target sample, guided by literature, gender considerations to the project
2. Identify timelines, terms and startups,, incentives, values, intellectual properties, outcomes and definition of success, and donors and finances including their interest, which target groups to be included? Gender issues, safety of workers and human subjects (including children).
3. Ethical consideration of participants – their voluntary participation, availability of collaborators, and their current or updated capabilities
Key questions: 1, What will be the task share for each partner that will not result in conflict?
2. How can the project proceed to satisfactory completion in case of fall outs with key
partners?
3. How do we deal with subawardees who might loose interest or get other engagements
amidst the project?
Probable answers:1. Based on competencies and capabilities of each partner
2. Bring on board new relevant partner in consultation with the funder
3. Inform and consult the funder
Conducting research in conflict zone is a big task! Proper strategies in identifying right collaborators which include other scientists and local people with relevant skills and abilities to deliver the mandates of the project research are indispensable. Then reach a compromise to work together to achieve the common goal(s), and rightly assigning the responsibilities to the partners with timelines.
1. What will be the specific role of the NGO and researchers involved in the project.
2. What will be the budget details to be considered with each assigned task.
Weather we have the same objective or not is one question. The second is having the same timeline.
Understanding the objectives and entering an agreement on the timeline may be the possible answers
Even though we have worked together in the past, I would like to know:
1. what would our roles be in the new project?
2. how does our capacity align to the roles we would be taking in the new project?
3. what resources would be availed for our specific activities?
How to get the answers
A review of the project documents from the donor
Discussion with partner on division of roles considering capacities
Societal challenges need to be addressed through collaborative research however, the long term interests of partners need to be aligned to the research process.
Some important questions are:
1. What proportion of counterpart funding will be borne by each collaborator?
Response: Jointly establish counterpart funding concerns from the conception of the project. Areas of
concern could be partner-time-allocation
2. Who will be the Lead Institution and Principal Investigator?
Response: Partners need to agree on the lead institution and PI based on research capabilities, experience in project implementation, and management
1. While planning for early grade learning project, I would ask my collaborating NGO to report on the on ground situation of learners
2. Which part of implementation process will be done by my team and for which your team will be responsible
While answering such questions
1. I shall gather the information about on ground situation of learners and then let my partner know about it.
2. I shall offer my expertise in implementation process
Very important is to set the ground bases as clear as possible to avoid confusions or misunderstandings later during the project development. Areas I will address are:
1. Budget. Based on activities and responsabilities.
2. Responsabilities. Assignment should be based on the level of knowledge, expertise or experience.
To progress from the initial partnership stage to practical planning for the project, consider the following key questions and areas:
(1) Good Diagnosis: From Present to Future: What is the current state of the targeted region in terms of bio-geo-cultural diversity, climate challenges, and peacebuilding initiatives? What are the existing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the project area? How can we project the anticipated changes and challenges in the region in the future?
(2) Role Definition for Each Actor: What specific roles and responsibilities will each stakeholder or actor have in the project? How can the expertise of each partner be leveraged to contribute effectively to the project’s goals? Are there any gaps in expertise or resources that must be addressed through collaboration?
(3) Building Bases for the Future: What foundational elements are required for successful project implementation and sustainability? How can the project contribute to community capacity building, knowledge transfer, and long-term resilience? What mechanisms will be implemented to ensure the project’s legacy and continued impact beyond its initial phase?
(4) Making Planning Possible and Realistic: What are the specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for the project? How will the project be financed, and what is the budgetary framework? What potential challenges and risks may arise during implementation, and how can they be mitigated? What monitoring and evaluation strategies will be employed to assess the project’s progress and effectiveness?
Comments (29)
Key questions:
-Expertise in working in conflict areas (Research institution and NGO)
-Availability of partners and timeline in conflict areas
Yes, it is very important that one identifies expertise in that area of research and from there finds other possible collaborators who are interested in coming together to find solution to the emerging problem to be addressed
You may also have to consider the expectations of all stakeholders involved in the project and how these expectations will be managed.
Overcoming these challenges can be through identifying and engaging with a local institution in the conflict area, this will ensure project viability and implementation
Take steps to identify the key partners and identify key strategies to be engaged in future collaborative assignments as a partner.
Key questions will be the identification of key stakeholders required for the implementation of the project and evaluating the risks associated with project implementation in the conflict area.
The next step is identifying local collaborators with an in-depth network and knowledge of the conflict-affected area and working together in developing a risk/security mitigation strategy that will guide the implementation of the project successful.
identifying partners involved is very key such that you work out the differences and also harnessing their various strategic plans.
We all agree that that big question is identifying the key stakeholders and if we are to effectively do this, taking keen observation on the purpose, goal, objectives and the beneficiaries of the intended project is key in identifying key stakeholders to the project implementation.
Understanding the scope of the intended project is vital for the proper mapping of relevant stakeholders to engage as well as for identifying potential collaborators to work with.
The key questions may be based on a hypothesis on the effectiveness of a proposed intervention and how it is operationalized in the field context
Key questions include
1. Decision on the target sample, guided by literature, gender considerations to the project
2. Identify timelines, terms and startups,, incentives, values, intellectual properties, outcomes and definition of success, and donors and finances including their interest, which target groups to be included? Gender issues, safety of workers and human subjects (including children).
3. Ethical consideration of participants – their voluntary participation, availability of collaborators, and their current or updated capabilities
Identifying experts who are best fit for the proposed project
Identify the partner and engaging properly with the local partner
Key questions: 1, What will be the task share for each partner that will not result in conflict?
2. How can the project proceed to satisfactory completion in case of fall outs with key
partners?
3. How do we deal with subawardees who might loose interest or get other engagements
amidst the project?
Probable answers:1. Based on competencies and capabilities of each partner
2. Bring on board new relevant partner in consultation with the funder
3. Inform and consult the funder
Conducting research in conflict zone is a big task! Proper strategies in identifying right collaborators which include other scientists and local people with relevant skills and abilities to deliver the mandates of the project research are indispensable. Then reach a compromise to work together to achieve the common goal(s), and rightly assigning the responsibilities to the partners with timelines.
1. What will be the specific role of the NGO and researchers involved in the project.
2. What will be the budget details to be considered with each assigned task.
Weather we have the same objective or not is one question. The second is having the same timeline.
Understanding the objectives and entering an agreement on the timeline may be the possible answers
What goals they have
their outcome
Discussion
Roles of partners, costs associated and other considerations for partnering!
Even though we have worked together in the past, I would like to know:
1. what would our roles be in the new project?
2. how does our capacity align to the roles we would be taking in the new project?
3. what resources would be availed for our specific activities?
How to get the answers
A review of the project documents from the donor
Discussion with partner on division of roles considering capacities
Societal challenges need to be addressed through collaborative research however, the long term interests of partners need to be aligned to the research process.
Some important questions are:
1. What proportion of counterpart funding will be borne by each collaborator?
Response: Jointly establish counterpart funding concerns from the conception of the project. Areas of
concern could be partner-time-allocation
2. Who will be the Lead Institution and Principal Investigator?
Response: Partners need to agree on the lead institution and PI based on research capabilities, experience in project implementation, and management
The knowledge gained in this training will be useful in conceptualization, implementation, dissemination and putting research into use
1. While planning for early grade learning project, I would ask my collaborating NGO to report on the on ground situation of learners
2. Which part of implementation process will be done by my team and for which your team will be responsible
While answering such questions
1. I shall gather the information about on ground situation of learners and then let my partner know about it.
2. I shall offer my expertise in implementation process
Second pillar is process where we move from partnership to relationship
Eye-opening view under the hood of collaboration and partnerships.
Very important is to set the ground bases as clear as possible to avoid confusions or misunderstandings later during the project development. Areas I will address are:
1. Budget. Based on activities and responsabilities.
2. Responsabilities. Assignment should be based on the level of knowledge, expertise or experience.
Thanks for the training. I would appreciate having similar training on other research issues.
To progress from the initial partnership stage to practical planning for the project, consider the following key questions and areas:
(1) Good Diagnosis: From Present to Future: What is the current state of the targeted region in terms of bio-geo-cultural diversity, climate challenges, and peacebuilding initiatives? What are the existing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the project area? How can we project the anticipated changes and challenges in the region in the future?
(2) Role Definition for Each Actor: What specific roles and responsibilities will each stakeholder or actor have in the project? How can the expertise of each partner be leveraged to contribute effectively to the project’s goals? Are there any gaps in expertise or resources that must be addressed through collaboration?
(3) Building Bases for the Future: What foundational elements are required for successful project implementation and sustainability? How can the project contribute to community capacity building, knowledge transfer, and long-term resilience? What mechanisms will be implemented to ensure the project’s legacy and continued impact beyond its initial phase?
(4) Making Planning Possible and Realistic: What are the specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for the project? How will the project be financed, and what is the budgetary framework? What potential challenges and risks may arise during implementation, and how can they be mitigated? What monitoring and evaluation strategies will be employed to assess the project’s progress and effectiveness?